<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Will Wilkinson - Latest Comments in After Heller</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/</link><description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:20:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: After Heller</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/07/16/after-heller/#comment-920724</link><description>The question is whether Heller neutralizes the political potency of the issue. I don't see a dramatic change, but if the regulators don't overstep, I see it fading.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Larry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:20:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: After Heller</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/07/16/after-heller/#comment-919511</link><description>Henigan's probably right to an extent.  But I think gun freedom activists are quite cognizant of de facto bans due to onerous or impossible to satisfy regulations.  A right that cannot be practically exercised is no right at all.    Now that the Supreme Court has recognized gun rights as an individual right, these de facto bans can be attacked more easily.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">crasch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:18:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>