<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Will Wilkinson - Latest Comments in Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/</link><description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:09:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-4091760</link><description>INTJ</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GilM</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-4082500</link><description>INFJ.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like others here, since I learned a little more about the MBTI, I've found usefully predicatively, so I keep it in my pocket, always mindful of its limitations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for g, WW, I can't follow you there, sorry. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No one can describe it - or agree on a description - no one can accurately measure it or duplicate another's measurement, no one can offer a prediction based on it, no one can tie it in any meaningful way to anatomy or brain function - it's clearly phlogiston, a ghost. It doesn't exist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webgrrl</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:30:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-4081409</link><description>xNTP, though I usually show up as a weak extrovert.  Everything else very, very strongly expressed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Megan McArdle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:51:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-4067788</link><description>INTJ</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GU</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:43:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707588</link><description>INTJ. I seem to recall in an undergrad psych class I was the only one out of almost 50 students who fit this, so it's pretty amazing to see how common it is here, but then again it was a NorCal school and they were probably almost all feelers...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:06:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707587</link><description>INTP</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:54:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707586</link><description>I'm not a typical reader, so don't count me for purposes of your unscientific poll, but just in case you are curious, I am an ISTJ.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:56:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707585</link><description>ISTP.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edward O'Connor</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:23:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707584</link><description>Hard to believe Yglesias is an NT, he always seemed more an FU.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707583</link><description>I've seen things that suggest that G may have something to do with conditions that affect the environment of information processing. If I remember, brighter people have lower levels of electrical activity in their brains, and lower levels of glucose, or something like that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Wilkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707582</link><description>xNTP here, too. I during high school (surprise surprise), E as I've grown a little older and moved around a lot. The line between T and F is also a very blurry one, which I think is why I tend more toward fiction in my writing interests.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:03:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707581</link><description>INTJ as well.  I agree completely that the mind is massively modular; different personalities are likely built out of a standard set of components, likely with different weightings arising out of a combination of pure inheritance and an Edelman-like neuronal selection process driven by early experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"G" is very likely just a way of the overall or coarse-grained interaction of all the modules -- in other words, any general intelligence measurement is looking at the emergent effects and overall efficiency of the cooperating and competing modular subunits.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This perspective is influenced greatly by Marvin Minsky's "society of mind" theories, and more recent elaborations of a modular perspective, but I've seen little that would suggest that a monolithic rather than a modular approach to cognition is called for.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Madsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707580</link><description>INTJ</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amber</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 05:56:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707579</link><description>INTP. I think my I is trending towards E, maybe for the same reason as Will. And the N is surprisingly weak.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amanda</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 05:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707578</link><description>BC, Yes about the variability. The reason I'm on the fence E/I-wise is that I'm an extremely gregarious extrovert around other NTs but can be pretty wallflower otherwise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Wilkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 04:42:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707577</link><description>eNTj sometimes iNTj</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank McGahon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 02:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707576</link><description>ENFJ, people. I'm crazy like that. Of course, I'm not actually a libertarian...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">belle waring</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 02:36:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707575</link><description>INTP&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was struck by how easily it depened on the situation for a lot of the questions, mainly the ones about introverted/extroverted. It mainly has to do with how secure I feel. I'm extremely extroverted in certain interesting class discussions and more introverted in personal relationships. I also do a lot of internal analyzing. So which one am I? Who knows. It isn't that easy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 01:30:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707574</link><description>For a long time I was INTP, but in recent tests I've come out ENTP, which I suppose makes sense with my personality changes in college.  I believe the first time I took it I was actually INTJ, but now I think the P may even be stronger than my N and T.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kenny Easwaran</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:45:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707573</link><description>Yet another INTJ here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicholas Weininger</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:46:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707572</link><description>INTJ  I like the M-B</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Bargagliotti</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:44:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707571</link><description>(And, now that I've read the article, I'll also note: very little fluctuation in my test outcome over time-- a long-term trend toward the J-P borderline from a strong J, but I've never come out anything other than INT, and strongly all those.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacob T. Levy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:35:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707570</link><description>Another INTJ, borderline P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacob T. Levy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707569</link><description>ENTJ, though borderline INTJ</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:07:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad Theories that Track Robust Regularities</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2004/11/20/bad-theories-that-track-robust-regularities/#comment-3707568</link><description>INTJ with J winning out slightly over P.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred Boness</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:06:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>