<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Will Wilkinson - Latest Comments in Equivalent In Your Dreams</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/</link><description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:02:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Equivalent In Your Dreams</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/04/equivalent-in-your-dreams/#comment-3010609</link><description>Interesting perspective.  A carbon tax does seem like a logical step....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Merle H</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Equivalent In Your Dreams</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/06/04/equivalent-in-your-dreams/#comment-3713555</link><description>The issue with both cap and trade and carbon taxes is not the collecting of the money but the spending of the money. We want the extra money collected spent on reducing greenhouse emissions but we do not trust governments or businesses to do this. The best way is give the money collected back to the general population and require them to spend the money given back in the market place of infrastructure to reduce greenhouse gases. That is, I get back the extra money but I must spend it on windmills, solar panels, geothermal plants, stopping cows emitting gas, insulation etc. This is remarkably easy to do and enforce. See &lt;a href="http://rewards.edentiti.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;rewards.edentiti.com&lt;/a&gt; on ways to do it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Cox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>