<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Will Wilkinson - Latest Comments in Grandpa&amp;#8217;s Little Helper</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/</link><description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:23:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Grandpa&amp;#8217;s Little Helper</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/02/grandpas-little-helper/#comment-3712607</link><description>Will Wilkinson &lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt; Because he evidently fails to inhabit the perspective of the ordinary 16 y/o pregnant girl. Many of them do become grandmothers at, say, 35. Which, judging from the large body of evidence about teen mothers, tends to be good for no one involved.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Was that true in the past.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Floccina</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grandpa&amp;#8217;s Little Helper</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/02/grandpas-little-helper/#comment-3712606</link><description>&lt;em&gt;But for most sixteen year-olds, the cost of having a kid is simply immense, possibly destroying any serious ambitions before they develop. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How much of those negative outcomes are relative.  If it was the norm for middle class and rich people to start having children at 16 would it still be so destructive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Floccina</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grandpa&amp;#8217;s Little Helper</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/02/grandpas-little-helper/#comment-3712605</link><description>push, Because he evidently fails to inhabit the perspective of the ordinary 16 y/o pregnant girl. Many of them do become grandmothers at, say, 35. Which, judging from the large body of evidence about teen mothers, tends to be good for no one involved.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Wilkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:08:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grandpa&amp;#8217;s Little Helper</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/02/grandpas-little-helper/#comment-3712608</link><description>Gendered?  Women don't become grandmothers?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pushmedia1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:23:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grandpa&amp;#8217;s Little Helper</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/02/grandpas-little-helper/#comment-3712604</link><description>Bryan's more general point, that we should look at the costs and benefits of having children over an entire lifetime, and not just the short-term, is helpful.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, I also found this post by Bryan pretty strange.  Maybe he is sick of all his liberal, atheist, childless friends degrading breeders like him all of the time?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GU</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grandpa&amp;#8217;s Little Helper</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/02/grandpas-little-helper/#comment-3712609</link><description>Brian has mentioned a couple times as well that his next book is going to be about this. As someone who really enjoyed The Myth of the Rational Voter, but will most likely remain childless, I am eagerly awaiting reading his full-length argument.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nicole</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:16:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>