-
Website
http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle -
Original page
http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/03/17/how-to-be-grotesquely-reductionist-and-utilitarian-about-human-love-and-life/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert S. Porter
56 comments · 1 points
-
uknowbetter
362 comments · 19 points
-
huadpe
40 comments · 1 points
-
Vangel
43 comments · 1 points
-
Michael Drake
109 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
A Little Mystic Nationalism
1 day ago · 37 comments
-
Scott Winship on Income Inequality
2 weeks ago · 26 comments
-
Now Let Us Praise Results-Facilitating Virtue!
5 days ago · 8 comments
-
Why Are There So few Women in Philosophy?
2 weeks ago · 20 comments
-
Hey, I Can’t Actually Quite Imagine a World in Which Things Are Exactly as Different as the Need to Be to Give Me What I Want, but It Would Be Neat if I Could!!
2 weeks ago · 21 comments
-
A Little Mystic Nationalism
Obligatory: 8-)
And certainly, if the ban were lifted, I wouldn't be able to keep myself from buying sexual services from these women. It's important that our society protects me from myself in this way.
Can't we simplify things and just herd people into reproduction camps?
Nonsense. Even considering humans only as 'biological types', this is nonsense. The children of prostitutes, or even the children of promiscuous, single mothers are not notably successful in modern society, nor have they been historically. Men have a strong incentive to marry a high-quality woman and invest in both her and their children. And, BTW, the investment in families is driven by love -- loving spouses and children is something we're 'designed' to do, not something we do in spite of our biology.
But, of course, that does not necessarily mean monogamy -- in addition to the above, there is also a biological incentive for additional sex on the side. And that is the Eliot Spitzer pattern.
Amen, brother Will.
I, like Will, am making the most of this life everyday and I remember that my actions do have consequences on the quality of my life in the future and the quality of life for others (an instinctively moral concept devoid of religious pretense). Oh, I do have a son, and I teach him to do the same thing.
For an exploration on the efficacy of anti-prostitution laws on meeting these stated goals see Malthus, Thomas R.
Is that line from the Church-approved edition of The Game?