<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Will Wilkinson - Latest Comments in If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/</link><description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description><atom:link href="https://willwilkinson.disqus.com/if_america_was_a_rational_technocracy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:28:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/01/20/if-america-was-a-rational-technocracy/#comment-5427762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul, are you talking about the wasted billions that Bush sent to Iraq?  I agree, that has been ineffective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:28:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/01/20/if-america-was-a-rational-technocracy/#comment-5425978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You seem to assume that the stated goals and the actual goals of a "rational technocracy" are the same.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What if the main goal of greatly increasing the size and scope of government is, well, just that? If the technocrats not only try, but actually succeed, in convincing people that it's not - well, that sounds like a decently rational technocracy to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">US</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:10:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/01/20/if-america-was-a-rational-technocracy/#comment-5410163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since it has proven to be ineffective for Washington to throw money at problems for the last 80 years or so, why not let the states spend the money as they please?   It is always possible that a 'local' idea will be a good one.  We desperately need new thinking.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul O'Pinion</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/01/20/if-america-was-a-rational-technocracy/#comment-5409927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, because that wouldn't be gamed to hell and back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:22:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/01/20/if-america-was-a-rational-technocracy/#comment-5409634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would like a very detailed post about what you would like done instead of "wasting a ton of money".  I assume you are one of the "smart people" you refer to.  And I would like to learn from "smart people".  So enlighten me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:06:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/01/20/if-america-was-a-rational-technocracy/#comment-5409491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're about to have the largest government intervention in the history of the world. You don't think the academic economists will be ALL OVER this data set? Sure it may not be completely randomized, but simple things (staggered or randomized phase-in, phase-out dates) can be done to facilitate experimental analysis. I agree that we should do these things, and with a bit of pressure, we may get it to happen. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:57:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/01/20/if-america-was-a-rational-technocracy/#comment-5409326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lee Kuan Yew, where art thou?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Random Walk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:50:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If America Was a Rational Technocracy</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/01/20/if-america-was-a-rational-technocracy/#comment-5409305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"but then very carefully gathering data about what happens when they do whatever they decide to do."  I like when people suggest program review as a solution, without considering just how much money it costs for the government to hire research firms and conduct this type of analysis.  Usually the post program review is the first thing to get cut, if the program is attacked by limited government types.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcotico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:48:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>