<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Will Wilkinson - Latest Comments in Illusions of Risk</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:10:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Illusions of Risk</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/10/25/illusions-of-risk/#comment-3710785</link><description>If somebody will show me where I can find a 50/50 shot at risking half my income for the chance to double it, I may consider the risk.&lt;br&gt;Odds worse than that and I think you can substitute "prudent" for "risk aversion". It seems that Americans are risking a lot more than people give them credit for. I don't know how we can have record debt, extremely low savings AND the insatiable desire for non-essential goods without betting that our futures will be at least as good if not better. Unless we're just stupid.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:10:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Illusions of Risk</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/10/25/illusions-of-risk/#comment-3710778</link><description>I think loss aversion is pretty easily explained by a diminishing marginal utility of wealth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Timothy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:44:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Illusions of Risk</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/10/25/illusions-of-risk/#comment-3710784</link><description>"How much of your income would you be willing to put at risk to get a chance at twice your current income? If you’re like most Americans, the answer is “not much”—and for a simple reason: While you’d love to have more money, your life would be thrown into turmoil if your income dropped by, say, half."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Loss aversion is a real phenomenon, but it irritates me when people use it willy-nilly.  The attitude described in the passage above doesn't require anything more than plain old risk aversion (though loss aversion *could* also be involved).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Illusions of Risk</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/10/25/illusions-of-risk/#comment-3710782</link><description>Hehe,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I assume nobody at Cato has parents in a nursing home or children in daycare or a medical condition not covered by insurance?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A drop in income for you guys will simply necessitate you  construct a less pretentious persona...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">monkyboy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:20:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Illusions of Risk</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/10/25/illusions-of-risk/#comment-3710781</link><description>Cold.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Wilkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:59:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Illusions of Risk</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/10/25/illusions-of-risk/#comment-3710780</link><description>I'll definitely document the changes in my happiness levels if you get run over by a cement truck.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nobody</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:53:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Illusions of Risk</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2006/10/25/illusions-of-risk/#comment-3710779</link><description>I wonder how many Catoites will get to test your theories if the Democrats return to power?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't forget to document your happiness levels as you search for another job guys!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">monkyboy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>