-
Website
http://willwilkinson.net/flybottle -
Original page
http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2007/06/12/john-schumaker-on-happiness/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert S. Porter
56 comments · 1 points
-
uknowbetter
362 comments · 19 points
-
huadpe
40 comments · 1 points
-
Vangel
43 comments · 1 points
-
Michael Drake
109 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Liberty in Context
2 weeks ago · 61 comments
-
Inequalities in Health Care
2 weeks ago · 31 comments
-
For More Responsible Climate Politics
2 weeks ago · 23 comments
-
http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2009/10/14/3821/
3 weeks ago · 27 comments
-
Technology Technology, Institutional Technology, and Global Warming
2 weeks ago · 12 comments
-
Liberty in Context
Do we know that this is true in an absolute, not just relative sense? I.e. I definitely agree that very wealthy folks in a society will have more opportunity for leisure, compared to poorer folks.
But if the whole society gets richer, do the people at the bottom really take more leisure time? Or do they keep working just as hard because, for example, they still care very much that they are on the bottom, and they still want to move up from the bottom?
I can see how it would be rational to use more leisure time (under some defition of "rational"). But is this how people actually react to increased absolute wealth (when there is no increase in relative wealth)?
Actually, in the U.S. the richer people are, the more they work. See Steven Landsburg's recent Slate piece. But I didn't primarily mean to be talking about "leisure time." Rather, I had in mind the discretion to make a living doing things you enjoy. I really meant to say that the wealthier a society is, the more discretion people living in it have... You can live a very nice life in the U.S. making pottery or arranging flowers or whatever you like for $15,000 a year, if you choose to live in the right place. A context of abundance makes work less like work for more and more people.