<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Will Wilkinson - Latest Comments in Nussbaum on Sex Work</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/</link><description>The Sweet Release of Reason</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:04:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nussbaum on Sex Work</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/26/nussbaum-on-sex-work/#comment-3712988</link><description>Nussbaum is arguing by assertion. Every one who takes some action that produces income from murder for hire to digging trenches can be be said  to belong to the group where ``all do things with parts of their bodies for which others offer them a fee.'' That much is not in dispute. But to look only at that commonality is to subtly avoid any meaningful debate. Nussbaum doesn't actually offer any /reason/ those who say that that the act of prostitution might be inherently wrong. I could make the same broad claim about murder for hire. But I suspect few people would agree with that claim because of the things that make murder for hire different from most other actions done for income.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not that I'm arguing that prostitution is actually equivalent to murder for hire. I think they are very different things. My point is that if we use the argument presented by Nussbaum in her op/ed, we don't actually have any criteria by which to say that murder for hire is different from prostitution or any other activity that generates incomee because she appears to have intentionally avoided that question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My suggestion is that those who would argue about whether or not prostitution should be legalized should first argue about what makes an action just or unjust. And then use the criteria for justice to evaluate the act of prostitution. Nussbaum may have done that elsewhere. She didn't do that in her op/ed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Malatesta</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:04:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nussbaum on Sex Work</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/26/nussbaum-on-sex-work/#comment-3712989</link><description>He means Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Wilkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:30:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nussbaum on Sex Work</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/26/nussbaum-on-sex-work/#comment-3712985</link><description>Dain, are you thinking of "Sex and Social Justice?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamelle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:55:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nussbaum on Sex Work</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/26/nussbaum-on-sex-work/#comment-3712984</link><description>Alex, I can't actually figure out why my feed is showing summaries, since it's set to show full text. Looking into it, thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Wilkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nussbaum on Sex Work</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/26/nussbaum-on-sex-work/#comment-3712983</link><description>just a note to request you change the RSS feed to supply full articles rather than just a two line teaser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:16:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nussbaum on Sex Work</title><link>http://www.willwilkinson.net/flybottle/2008/04/26/nussbaum-on-sex-work/#comment-3712986</link><description>This echoes her book on the visceral reaction of "disgust" and the way it affects politics. I forgot the name...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dain</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>