DISQUS

Will Wilkinson: Opposite Day

  • PGR · 3 years ago
    Income inequality is bad.
  • Glen Whitman · 3 years ago
    Utilitarianism! (You may choose between act and rule utilitarianism. Or go with some combination or third variation, if you want.)
  • GilM · 3 years ago
    Moving towards privately owned retirement accounts is too risky.
  • Jake Winship · 3 years ago
    Negative internalities require societal restraints on individual action
  • Will Wilkinson · 3 years ago
    Jake, You'll have to phrase that more narrowly, since I don't disagree, unless you mean "all negative externalities..."
  • R.J. Lehmann · 3 years ago
    I think he's referring to "internalities," as in, people should be saved from themselves. But you may not disagree with that either, in certain circumstances.
  • Jake Winship · 3 years ago
    Yes, I meant the specific issue of negative results imposed on a person's "future self" by her voluntary decisions - I think this a harder sell than externalities, even post-Coase
  • asg · 3 years ago
    Property rights are very weak and originate from the state.
  • penner · 3 years ago
    Negative liberty ("right to be left alone") is what's really important; its value doesn't come from its contribution to positive liberty.
  • Javier · 3 years ago
    Equality of opportunity as the premier or central principle of distributive justice. And I mean equality of opportunity in the "fair" sense: everyone needs an equal starting chance, controlling for unequal social and natural endowments.
  • Javier · 3 years ago
    The "controlling for" bit should read "leveling out initially unequal social and natural endowments"
  • Ben A · 3 years ago
    I'll second Javier. Equality of opportunity is a/the central principle of distibutive justice.
  • Dallas · 3 years ago
    There are no objective moral truths.
  • Will Wilkinson · 3 years ago
    We're getting close, folks. Do I hear a third for equality of opportunity?
  • Jake Winship · 3 years ago
    I'll third the proposition, but I'm not sure that I entirely disagree with the premise. Execution can be a sticking point - maybe address that aspect.