Will Wilkinson: Opposite Day
-
PGR · 3 years agoIncome inequality is bad.
-
Glen Whitman · 3 years agoUtilitarianism! (You may choose between act and rule utilitarianism. Or go with some combination or third variation, if you want.)
-
GilM · 3 years agoMoving towards privately owned retirement accounts is too risky.
-
Jake Winship · 3 years agoNegative internalities require societal restraints on individual action
-
Will Wilkinson · 3 years agoJake, You'll have to phrase that more narrowly, since I don't disagree, unless you mean "all negative externalities..."
-
R.J. Lehmann · 3 years agoI think he's referring to "internalities," as in, people should be saved from themselves. But you may not disagree with that either, in certain circumstances.
-
Jake Winship · 3 years agoYes, I meant the specific issue of negative results imposed on a person's "future self" by her voluntary decisions - I think this a harder sell than externalities, even post-Coase
-
asg · 3 years agoProperty rights are very weak and originate from the state.
-
penner · 3 years agoNegative liberty ("right to be left alone") is what's really important; its value doesn't come from its contribution to positive liberty.
-
Javier · 3 years agoEquality of opportunity as the premier or central principle of distributive justice. And I mean equality of opportunity in the "fair" sense: everyone needs an equal starting chance, controlling for unequal social and natural endowments.
-
Javier · 3 years agoThe "controlling for" bit should read "leveling out initially unequal social and natural endowments"
-
Ben A · 3 years agoI'll second Javier. Equality of opportunity is a/the central principle of distibutive justice.
-
Dallas · 3 years agoThere are no objective moral truths.
-
Will Wilkinson · 3 years agoWe're getting close, folks. Do I hear a third for equality of opportunity?
-
Jake Winship · 3 years agoI'll third the proposition, but I'm not sure that I entirely disagree with the premise. Execution can be a sticking point - maybe address that aspect.