Community Page
- willwilkinson.net/flybottle Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Poverty makes people helpless. The government of the country do a lot but not able to cope up with this.
- But most European countries are ones whose identity arises from the arbitrariness of who married who (eg the ascension of the Scottish King James VI to be King of England as well was the result of...
- You are what you eat. Not only kids who love fast food, adults love it too. If you can not leave fast food, because you're happy with that, just don't get it too much. Exercise will make...
- Now that we are facing recession.. Everyone must cut off their expenses.. This is a very helpful post for everyone..
- Negative emotions can wreck ones relationship with others. Each one of us had different points of views regarding with this issue, your point view is quite interesting thanks for sharing it with us.
Jump to original thread »
Gated summaries of gated papers are annoying, but the result is interesting, so I thought I’d pass this along:
Put four Boston students-all strangers-in a game where they must distribute tokens among themselves using rules that reward both selfish and cooperative moves; allow t ... Continue reading »
Put four Boston students-all strangers-in a game where they must distribute tokens among themselves using rules that reward both selfish and cooperative moves; allow t ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
I take it all plausible third variables are accounted for in the paper? (Of the distinctions that could be drawn between Europe and the near Middle-East, "collectivism" doesn't strike me as necessarily the most salient.)
1 year ago
In Japan as well, people have a strong sense of in-group vs. out-group. It's not along tribal lines, exactly, but people who are extremely polite when the lines of demarcation are clearly drawn are often extremely less so when there are no clear group distinctions.
Note that in Japan as well as in the Middle East, it's certainly not the case that out-group members are treated impolitely in general. Quite the reverse; there are certain areas, such as hospitality, where one is supposed to be more polite to an out-group member. However, there are various boundaries, rules, and defined roles.
Societies that rely a lot on fairly formal standards of politeness and in-group versus out-group thinking seem to have more difficulty maintaining altruism in unfamiliar situations where the roles are not clear. That said, they may be more altruistic in general, both with insiders and outsiders, as the vast majority of interactions may take place along well-defined pathways.
1 year ago
It is of course ridiculous to pretend that tribalist, communitarian, and group-oriented societies are not based on materially significant relations of extended mutual advantage. For most people in these societies, the tribal or simple in-group (or in-corporation in Japanese society) relationships are ones of extended mutual advantage.
I don't think you meant that strictly, however. They are, we agree, missing out by not forming mutually beneficial relationships with more outsiders. The post begs the question of exactly how to quantify what they are missing out on.
After all, how realistic is the situation typified by such games and experiments? The vast majority of the time, people in more collectivist societies would be "playing the game" with people with whom they have a developed role and relationship-- something that even extends to be participants in a chatroom.
The point to me is not the ability to form mutually beneficial relationships, but the universality of being willing to consider new mutually beneficial relationships with strangers and with people in unfamiliar roles and ways; the dynamism, if you will. I think that people sacrifice a lot by not extending to a universal consideration of the human race, but I base that on moral grounds as well, and admit to a "feeling of warmth" for all my fellow humans.
1 year ago